Hilgers TW, Stanford JB. Creighton Model NaProEducation Technology for Avoiding Pregnancy: Use Effectiveness. J Reprod Med 1998; 43 (June):495-502. http://www.jreprodmed.com/abs/jrm427.htm

Howard MP, Stanford JB. Pregnancy probabilities during use of the Creighton Model FertilityCare System. Arch Fam Med 1999; 8:391-402. Review reference: http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/8/5/391

Fehring RJ, Lawrence D, Philpot C. Use effectiveness of the Creighton Model Ovulation Method of Natural Family Planning. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs 1994; 23:303-309. Review abstract: http://jognn.awhonn.org/cgi/content/abstract/23/4/303

Doud J. Use-effectiveness of the Creighton Model of Natural Family Planning. Int Rev Nat Fam Plann 1985; 9(1) Spring:54-72.

To Achieve Pregnancy in Normal Fertility

Stanford JB, Smith KR, Dunson DB. Vulvar mucus observations and the probability of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101(6):1285-93. Review abstract: http://www.greenjournal.org/cgi/content/abstract/101/6/1285

Hilgers TW, Daly KD, Prebil AM, Hilgers SK. Cumulative pregnancy rates in patients with apparently normal fertility and fertility-focused intercourse. J Reprod Med 1992; 37(10):864-866.